One of my web comments about Richard III from today:
One argument which can be made against claims that the later portrayal of Richard III was just Tudor propaganda is that there never was any attempt by Yorkist pretenders and relatives living abroad to create and cultivate a cult of a martyred good king around Richard III.
In fact, there appears to have been basically no attempts at all to counter the Tudor portrayal of him, which should make us question whether the Tudor portrayal really was so far away from how he was seen by people neutral or even supportive to the Yorkist cause.
When his own designated heir and nephew, the earl of Lincoln, made his move to regain the throne for York in 1487, the earl used Lambert Simnel in an effort to use the memory of Edward IV against Henry VII, instead of trying to appear as an avenger of Richard III.
Richard III's sister, the dowager duchess of Burgundy, safe on the continent and living in a declining but still celebrated centre of artistic patronage, would have had ample resources to draw in an effort to shape his brother's memory after 1485, but no effort was made.
More examples could be easily given, but the fact is that when a lot of people could have stood up for Richard III after 1485, many out of the reach of Henry VII, none did beyond some recorded laments about his fate by the burghers of York.
This, I think, shows that Richard III was viewed at best with indifference by people hostile to the Lancaster and Tudor dynasties and that although propagandistic in nature, the Tudor portrayal of him had a core which was more or less in accordance with the public view of him.
In fact, there appears to have been basically no attempts at all to counter the Tudor portrayal of him, which should make us question whether the Tudor portrayal really was so far away from how he was seen by people neutral or even supportive to the Yorkist cause.
When his own designated heir and nephew, the earl of Lincoln, made his move to regain the throne for York in 1487, the earl used Lambert Simnel in an effort to use the memory of Edward IV against Henry VII, instead of trying to appear as an avenger of Richard III.
Richard III's sister, the dowager duchess of Burgundy, safe on the continent and living in a declining but still celebrated centre of artistic patronage, would have had ample resources to draw in an effort to shape his brother's memory after 1485, but no effort was made.
More examples could be easily given, but the fact is that when a lot of people could have stood up for Richard III after 1485, many out of the reach of Henry VII, none did beyond some recorded laments about his fate by the burghers of York.
This, I think, shows that Richard III was viewed at best with indifference by people hostile to the Lancaster and Tudor dynasties and that although propagandistic in nature, the Tudor portrayal of him had a core which was more or less in accordance with the public view of him.
No comments:
Post a Comment