A genocide 'sanitized' by the press to 'protect' their audiences from 'graphic' images is a genocide whose culprits are more likely to escape justice and act as successful role models for future genocidaires.
Friday, August 14, 2026
WHY ARE YOU NOT ACTING?
If you won't oppose ongoing genocides, why are you crying real or crocodile tears over one that ended 81 years ago?
Why are you not acting?
Are the victims in the ongoing genocides simply 'wrong'?
'Wrong' geographical location, 'wrong' language, 'wrong' pigment, 'wrong' religion?
Or are the genocidaires 'wrong'?
 |
| "Abu Shouk camp is one of the areas that have recently been targeted in El Fasher (Credit: Abdulhafeez al Ghali)" MSF urges lifting of El Fasher siege to deliver aid - Radio Tamazuj |
THE SELF-DESTRUCTIVE AMERICAN EMPIRE
How many large wars did the British Empire fight between 1815 and 1914?
Essentially one, the Crimean War, and that was geographically very limited, with limited ground troops.
And when the British Empire had to fight two large wars in thirty years, it was finished.
The American Empire hasn't learned that key part in keeping up a global empire is avoiding wars.
Instead the American Empire seeks significant wars, in the belief that it must constantly prove itself.
This is self-destructive in the long-term.
Even if the leadership would be competent.
Empires have been sold with the promise that they bring peace ("Pax Britannica"), but the American Empire and its imperial presidency believe they need regularly to break peace for the sake of military triumphs.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)